Ponnammal v. Selvakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal under Section 100 CPC was dismissed by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court as not pressed, since the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the matter was settled between the parties.
What did the court decide?
No costs.
What the court decided
S.A(MD)No.367 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR S.A(MD)No.367 of 2005
1.Ponnammal
2.Rajam 3.Muthumani ...Appellants/Respondents/Plaintiffs Vs. 1.Selvakumar 2.Paulraj ...Respondents/Appellants/Defendants
PRAYER : Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the decree and judgment passed by the Subordinate Judge, Padmanabhapuram, dated 15.03.2004 and passed in A.S.No.114 of 2000 reversing the judgment of the Additional District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram, dated 28.08.2000 passed in O.S.No.84 of 1998.
For Appellants : Mr.T.Selvakumaran For R1 : Mr.K.P.Narayanakumar For R2 : Mr.C.Sankar Prakash
O R D E R
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel appearing for the appellants would submit that the matter has been settled between the parties and prays for dismissal of the appeal as not pressed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ponnammal
- appellant
Rajam
- appellant
Muthumani
- respondent
Selvakumar
- respondent
Paulraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court