Annaraj v. Francis
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed as abated because the sole respondent died, and the appellant failed to implead the legal heirs within the given timeframe.
What did the court decide?
No costs. Appeal dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.1227 of 2005
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 23.11.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
S.A.(MD)No.1227 of 2005
Annaraj ... Appellant / Respondent / Plaintiff
-vs-
Francis ... Respondent/Appellant/Defendant
PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C, against the judgment and decree dated 19.11.2003 made in A.S.No.128 of 1998, on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai, which was filed against the judgment and decree dated 24.08.1998 in O.S.No.391 of 1995 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Kuzhithurai.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Ramesh For Respondent : Mr.C.Godwin
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Annaraj
- respondent
Francis
Coram
R. Vijayakumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court