Dismissed

Ramamurthy v. Thamizh Kozhundhu

Madras HC22 Nov 2021SA(MD)/219/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed the Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the decree of the Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam, confirming the District Munsif Court's judgment. The appeal was summarily disposed of without detailed reasoning.

What did the court decide?

Judgment and Decree of Principal Sub Court and District Munsif Court confirmed; Second Appeal dismissed. No costs.

Ramamurthy Vs Thamizh Kozhundhu — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

SA(MD). No.219 of 2005

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶3

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶4

Monday, the Twenty Second day of November Two Thousand Twenty One

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R. VIJAYAKUMAR

¶7

SA(MD). No.219 of 2005

¶8

RAMAMURTHY ... Appellant/Appellant/1^st Respondent

1 THAMIZH KOZHUNDHU

2 MAHALAKSHMI

3 MINOR SEETHADEVI

¶13

(REP. BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN, MAHALAKSHMI)

¶14

(RELIEF AGAINST R2 & R3 GIVEN,UP).

¶15

... Respondents

¶16

Prayer:-

¶17

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree of the Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam dated 12.03.2004 made in Appeal Suit No.150 of 2003, confirming the judgment and decree of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Papanasam made in Original Suit No.217 of 1996 dated 26.06.2003.

¶18

DECREE:-

¶19

This Second Appeal coming on for hearing on Monday the Fifteenth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty One, upon perusing the grounds of Appeal, the judgments and decrees of the Lower Appellate Court and the Court of First Instance and the material papers in the Suit and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.C.VAKEESWARAN, Advocate for the Appellant and of Mr.S.ANAND CHANDRASEKAR,for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates for the first respondent, having stood over for consideration till this day this Court doth order and decree as follows:-

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

1/2

¶22

SA(MD). No.219 of 2005

¶23

(1) That the Judgment and Decree of both Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam dated 12.03.2004 made in Appeal Suit No.150 of 2003, confirming the Judgment and Decree of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Papanasam made in Original Suit No.217 of 1996 dated 26.06.2003.be and hereby are confirmed and this Second appeal is dismissed.

¶24

(2) That there be no costs in this Second Appeal.

¶25

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶26

// True Copy //

¶27

/ /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶28

¶29

The Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam

¶30

The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Papanasam Copy to:

¶31

The Section Officer,

¶32

V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 2 Copies

¶33

+1 CC to M/s.C. VAKEESWARAN, Advocate ( SR-35438 dated 23/11/2021 ) +1 CC to M/s.SARVABHAUMAN ASSOCIATES, Advocate ( SR-35418 dated 23/11/2021 )

¶34

ORDER DATED : 22/11/2021 ========================== DECREE ========================== SA(MD). No.219 of 2005 Nature of Decree:- Dismissing the Second Appeal preferred against the judgment and decree of the Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam dated 12.03.2004 made in Appeal Suit No.150 of 2003, confirming the judgment and decree of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Papanasam made in Original Suit No.217 of 1996 dated 26.06.2003.

¶35

RK(21/12/2021) 2P 7C

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶37

2/2

Ramamurthy v. Thamizh Kozhundhu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramamurthy v. Thamizh Kozhundhu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Palani Asari, Vs R.Kumara Udayamarthandan

T.Pathmavathy Vs the Tamilnadu Electricityboard

Ramalingam Vs M.Kamala Ammal

S.Balasubramanian Vs S.Natarajan

Marimuthu Vs Arulmigu Kaliammal Koil

Annaraj Vs Francis