A.Palaniappan v. K.Uma
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court allowed a Civil Miscellaneous Petition seeking permission to retrieve an original settlement deed from the file of the Subordinate Judge based on respondent counsel's consent.
What did the court decide?
Registry directed to return original settlement deed (Ex.B1) to petitioner's counsel.
What the court decided
CMP(MD) No.9791 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Fifth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty One PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice R. VIJAYAKUMAR
CMP(MD) No.9791 of 2021 IN SA(MD)No.373 of 2008
A.PALANIYAPPAN
... PETITIONER/APPELLANT
Vs
1 K.UMA 2 MUTHU MEENAL
3 K.R.VEERAPPAN ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to return the original document of settlement deed dated 14.08.2002 registered on the file of SRO, Devakottai which is marked as Ex.B.1 in the OS No.7 of 2004 on the file of the Learned Subordinate Judge, Devakottai.
PRAYER IN SA(MD)No.373 of 2008:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A. PALANIYAPPAN
- respondent
K. UMA
- respondent
MUTHU MEENAL
- respondent
K.R. VEERAPPAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court