The Single Judge dismissed W.P.No.38253 of 2005 as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel endorsed that the writ petition had become infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 21.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.38253 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.Nos.40905 of 2005 & 118 of 2015
M/s.Marshall Sons & Co. (India) Limited, No.3, Netaji Subhash Road, Kolkata - 700 001. Rep.by its Director Mrs.Pramila Bajoria. ..Petitioner
vs
Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records leading to the passing of the impugned order No.TN/SRO/AMB/4257/Recovery/2005, dated 16.11.2005 by the first respondent herein and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Srikanth
For Respondents: Mr.J.Sathyanarayana Prasad for R1 & R2
: No Appearance for R3
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
dh
To
W.P.No.38253 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.Nos.40905 of 2005 & 118 of 2015
VBA(CO)
SP(19/08/2019)
M/s.Marshall Sons & Co. (India) Limited
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
M/s.Marshall Sons & Co. (Manufacturing) Ltd.
K. Kalynasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
