D.Kasthuri v. the Chairman
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court did not adjudicate the merits of illegal construction. It directed the petitioner to submit a fresh representation and the respondent to consider it within specified timelines after affording opportunities.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner was directed to submit a fresh representation within two weeks for the respondent to consider.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 21.06.2019 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.37241 of 2005
and
W.P.M.P.Nos.39872 of 2005 & 668 of 2011
D.Kasthuri .. Petitioner
Vs
- The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, No.5, Kamaraj Salai,
Chennai - 600 005.
- The Executive Engineer, Zone IV, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, T.P.Chathiram,
Chennai - 600 010.
- Kesavan .. Respondents
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Director of Slum Clearance Board should remove illegal construction made by a third party in open space.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D. Kasthuri
- respondent
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board
- respondent
The Executive Engineer, Zone IV, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board
- respondent
Kesavan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court