Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order and sanction for pipeline installation. The petition was found infructuous due to the petitioner's own endorsement, resulting in dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 20.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.23304 of 2005 and 25405 of 2005
P.Kathiresan ...Petitioner
Vs
1. The District Collector,
Namakkal,
Namakkal District.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Namakkal,
Namakkal District.
3. The Thasildar,
Taluk Office,
Rasipuram,
Namakkal District.
4. The Executive Engineer,
Public Works Department,
Neer Athara Amaipu,
Sarabanga Basin Sub Division,
Namakkal,
Namakkal District.
5. The Assistant Executive Engineer,
Public Works Department,
Neervala Athara Amaipu,
Sarabanga Basin Sub Division,
Rasipuram 637 408,
Namakkal District.
6. The Junior Engineer,
Public Works Department,
Neervala Athara Amaipu,
Irrigation Division,
Rasipuram 637 408.
Namakkal District. ...Respondents
Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 5th respondent pertaining to his proceedings dated 07.07.2005 and quash the same and direct the respondents herein to grant sanction for the pipelines installed by the petitioner between his lands in S.No.198/50 and 87/2C, 90/3 of Minnakkal Village, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District, for taking water.
For Petitioner : M/s.G.Arul Murugan For Respondents : Mr.B.Anand, G.A. ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In the light of the above submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pvs To 1. The District Collector, Namakkal, Namakkal District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal, Namakkal District. 3. The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Rasipuram, Namakkal District.
P. Kathiresan
The District Collector, Namakkal
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal
The Thasildar, Rasipuram
The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Works Department
K. KALYANASUNDARAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
