Writ petition for a Writ of Mandamus to prevent police and revenue officials from blocking water transportation was dismissed as infructuous upon the petitioner's counsel submission.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 21.06.2019 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.20363 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009
Sivagami
...Petitioner
Vs
Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents from preventing the petitioner from transporting the water from their well situated in re-survey No.146/1B in Santhipalayam Village, Gobichettipalayam Taluk to their Divya Dyeing Factory situated at S.F.No.215, Govindan Thottam, Chinnakarai, Palladam Road, Tiruppur through the tanker lorry, bearing TN 28 Y 0599.
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
To
+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No. 51706 W.P.No.20363 of 2009 A.SK(13/08/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sivagami
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur
The Inspector of Police, Palladam Police Station, Tiruppur District
K. Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
