High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence at the hearing on 19.06.2019.
No costs; disposal of writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 20.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.10579 of 2012
S.Anandhan ...Petitioner
Vs
1. The Executive Engineer,
Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board,
Chennai 10.
2. The Estate Officer -1,
No.1/1, Ibrahim Salai, Chennai.
3. The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai, Chennai 3. ...Respondents
Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing
the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner
dated 19.02.2009.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents : Mr.R.Sivakumar, for RR1 & 2
Mrs.Karthikaa Ashok, for R3
ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing on 19.06.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the petition is posted today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
pvs
To
S.Anandhan
The Executive Engineer, Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board, Chennai
The Estate Officer -1, No.1/1, Ibrahim Salai, Chennai
The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai
K.Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
