Partly allowed

Kiran Velagapudi v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC8 Mar 2019CRL MP/1562/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought relaxation of bail conditions requiring daily reporting. Court modified condition to weekly reporting on Saturdays until further orders, with automatic cancellation of bail upon non-compliance.

What did the court decide?

Condition of daily appearance relaxed to appear once weekly on Saturdays at 10.30 a.m. Non-compliance entails automatic cancellation of bail.

Kiran Velagapudi Vs the State Rep by Its — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Eighth day of March Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R. MAHADEVAN

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.1562 of 2019

¶7

in CRL OP.No.23883 of 2018

¶8

KIRAN VELAGAPUDI [ PETITIONER ] Vs THE STATE REP BY ITS, [ RESPONDENT ] THE DEPUTY SUPERINTERNDENT OF POLICE, IDOL WING, CID GUINDY, CHENNAI CRIME NO.02 OF 2016.

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition that to appear and report before the Idol Wing Officials Thiruchirapalli daily at 10.30 a.m imposed on the petitioner vide order in Crl.O.P.No.23883 of 2018 dated 21.12.2018.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of MR.SHANMUGASUNDARAM Senior Counsel for M/S.N.CHIDAMBARAM, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.S.THANKIRA GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶11

This Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed vide order dated 21.12.2018, made in Crl.O.P.No.23883 of 2018.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.23883 of 2018 on 21.12.2018 regularly and he prayed for relaxation of the said condition.

¶13

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly but the enquiry is still pending.

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition imposed on 21.12.2018, stands modified and the petitioner shall appear before the Idol Wing officials, Chennai once in a week i.e. on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. Non-compliance of this order by the petitioner, if noticed, the earlier bail granted by this Court shall stand cancelled automatically. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

¶16

-sd/08/03/2019

¶17

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned

¶18

TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE (FAC), KUMBAKONAM. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THANJAVUR. [FOR INFORMATION]

¶19

3 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE IDOL WING C.I.D, CHENNAI

¶20

4 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, IDOL WING OFFICIALS, THIRUCHIRAPALLI. 5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 6 THE SPECIAL OFFICER IDOL WING CID, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

7 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTERNDENT OF POLICE, IDOL WING CID GUINDY, CHENNAI

¶23

8 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, IDOL WING OFFICIALS, CHENNAI

¶24

+1 C.C. to M/S.N.CHIDAMBARAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.4986

¶25

Order
in
CRL MP.1562/2019
in
CRL OP.23883/2018
Date :08/03/2019
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
cm 20/03/2019

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kiran Velagapudi v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kiran Velagapudi v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Thangaraju ,Oor Gounder Vs The Commissioner

Santhanakrishnan Vs State by

Suresh Vs State Rep by

Dheenadhayalan, Vs State of Tamilnadu

Sri Thiruvengambam Shivalaya Arakattalai, Vs The Inspector General of Police

M/s. Sakkudi Sri Varadaraja Perumal Temple Trust, Vs The Special Officer