Allowed

Santhanakrishnan v. State by

Madras HC1 Mar 2019CRL MP/1775/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal miscellaneous petition sought to relax the bail condition requiring the petitioner to report daily to a magistrate. The court allowed the petition, modifying the condition to require weekly reporting on Mondays, citing the petitioner's regular compliance without fail.

What did the court decide?

The condition to report daily was modified to require appearance once a week on every Monday at 10.30 a.m.

Santhanakrishnan Vs State by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the First day of March Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice R. MAHADEVAN

¶6

and

¶7

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶8

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.1775 of 2019

¶9

IN CRL OP.26743/2018

¶10

SANTHANAKRISHNAN [ PETITIONER ]

¶11

¶12

STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ]

¶13

INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶14

GINGEE POLICE STATION, GINGEE, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT. (CR.NO.733 OF 2018)

¶15

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition that the petitioner should report before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate(FAC) Kumbakonam daily at 10.30 am until further orders in Crl.O.P.No.26743 of 2018 order dt 19.12.2018.

¶16

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.G.SENTHIL KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.K.THANGIRA, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE [CRL.SIDE] on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶17

This Court, while granting bail to the petitioner vide order dated 19.12.2018, made in Crl.O.P.No.26743 of 2018, imposed a condition to the effect that he should report before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (FAC), Kumbakonam, daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. Seeking to relax the same, the present Miscellaneous Petition has been filed.

¶18

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court vide order dated 19.12.2018, made in Crl.O.P.No.26743 of 2018. The said submission has been fairly conceded by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side).

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions without fail, the condition imposed on 19.12.2018 is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ modified to the effect that the petitioner shall appear before the

¶20

learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (FAC), Kumbakonam, once in a week i.e. on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. Any non-compliance of this order by the petitioner, if noticed, the earlier bail order shall be cancelled automatically. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶21

-sd/01/03/2019

¶22

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE (FAC), KUMBAKONAM.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
GINGEE POLICE STATION, GINGEE,
VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1C.C. to M/S.K.G.SENTHIL KUMAR Advocate on payment of
necessary charges in SR.NO. 4559
Order
in
CRL MP.1775/2019
in
CRL OP.26743/2018
Date :01/03/2019

¶23

From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶24

MLT-20/03/2019

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Santhanakrishnan v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santhanakrishnan v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rangarajan Narasimhan, A/47 Vs the Inspector General of

Kempraj Vs Inspector General Of Police

S.Sakthivel Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Suresh Vs State Rep by

A.Thangaraju ,Oor Gounder Vs The Commissioner

Kiran Velagapudi Vs the State Rep by Its