Allowed

Suresh v. State Rep by

Madras HC1 Mar 2019CRL MP/3117/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a bail petitioner's application to relax a bail condition mandating daily reporting to the magistrate. While acknowledging regular compliance, the court modified the requirement to a weekly visit on Mondays, warning of automatic bail cancellation for non-compliance.

What did the court decide?

Bail reporting condition modified from daily to once a week on Mondays at 10.30 a.m.; non-compliance leads to automatic bail cancellation.

Suresh Vs State Rep by — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the First day of March Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice R. MAHADEVAN

¶6

and

¶7

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

¶8

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.3117 of 2019

¶9

IN CRL OP.28657/2018

¶10

SURESH [ PETITIONER ] Vs

¶11

STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GINGEE POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT. (CR.NO.733 OF 2018)

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition that “the petitioner shall appear before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Kumbakonam daily at about 10.30 a.m until further orders” in order dated 19.12.2018 made in Crl.O.P.No.28657 of 2018 by this Hon'ble Court.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.K.T.S.SIVAKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.S.THANKIRA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶14

This Court, while granting bail to the petitioner vide order dated 19.12.2018, made in Crl.O.P.No.28657 of 2018, imposed a condition to the effect that he should report before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam, daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. Seeking to relax the same, the present Miscellaneous Petition has been filed.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court vide order dated 19.12.2018, made in Crl.O.P.No.28657 of 2018. The said submission has been fairly conceded by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side).

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions without fail, the condition imposed on 19.12.2018 is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam, once in a week i.e. on every Monday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. Any non-compliance of this order by the petitioner, if noticed, the earlier bail order shall be cancelled automatically. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

¶18

-sd/-

¶19

01/03/2019

¶20

This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KUMBAKONAM.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
THANJAVOOR.[FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
GINGEE POLICE STATION,
VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1C.C. to M/S.K.T.S.SIVAKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary
charges SR NO.4445
Order
in
CRL MP.3117/2019
in
CRL OP.28657/2018
Date :01/03/2019
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ MK:20/03/2019

Suresh v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rangarajan Narasimhan, A/47 Vs the Inspector General of

Kempraj Vs Inspector General Of Police

S.Sakthivel Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Santhanakrishnan Vs State by

A.Thangaraju ,Oor Gounder Vs The Commissioner

Kiran Velagapudi Vs the State Rep by Its