New Srn Agencies v. L. Meenakshi
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petitions challenging alleged willful disobedience of the Hon'ble Court's orders were heard. The Court found no willful disobedience and closed the petitions, directing the petitioner-dealer to appear before the Respondent-ACCT upon her return from leave.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to appear before the Respondent-ACCT after she joins duty on completion of leave. No costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.01.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition Nos.2567 and 2568 of 2018 M/s.New SRN Agencies, Rep., by its Proprietor, P.Karikalan, No.13-A, Royal Street, Keelkattalai, Chennai-600 117. ... Petitioner in both petitions
-vs-
Mrs.L.Meenakshi, The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Madipakkam Assessment Circle, Chennai-600 100. ... Respondent in both petitions
PETITIONS filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for the willful disobedience of the common order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.32887 and 32888 of 2017, dated 09.01.2018.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s.New SRN Agencies
- respondent
Mrs.L.Meenakshi
Coram
T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court