A.Ganesan v. K.Pandy
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed Contempt Petition No. 367 of 2017 after the petitioner submitted that the order in W.P. No. 24058 of 2016 was complied with. No costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.01.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.367 of 2017 A.Ganesan (TR 1010) ... Petitioner -vsMr.K.Pandy, The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited, 12, Ramakrishna Salai, Salem-636 007. ... Respondent Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.24058 of 2016 dated 13.07.2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Nagarathinam For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai, Government Advocate ******
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.24058 of 2016
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ dated 13.07.2016, has been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A. Ganesan
- respondent
Mr. K. Pandy
Coram
T.S. Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court