V.Ganesan v. Ramesh
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court, in a contempt petition, heard submissions by the Government Advocate that the respondent Tahsildar promised to restore revenue entries within two weeks. Recording the submission, the court closed the contempt petition but directed the respondent to issue consequential orders and restore revenue entries within that timeframe.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed with a direction to the respondent to restore revenue entries within two weeks; liberty granted for restoration upon non-compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.01.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.2509 of 2018
1.V.Ganesan
2.V.Sadagopan
3.V.Murugadoss
Petitioners 1 to 3 are represented by
their Power Agent, Mr.P.Vairamani
... Petitioners
-vs-
Mr.Ramesh,
The Tahsildar,
Sriperumpudur Taluk,
Sriperumpudur,
Kancheepuram (D.T). ... Respondent
Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for having
committed contempt of this Court's order dated 22.01.2015
in W.P.No.1430 of 2015.
For Petitioners : Mr.P.Rajesh
For Respondent : Mr.M.Elumalai,
Government Advocate
2
ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent Tahsildar must be held in contempt for non-compliance with a previous Court order regarding revenue records
Whether the contempt petition should be closed based on the respondent's undertaking to implement corrections within two weeks
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Ganesan and V.Sadagopan and V.Murugadoss
- respondent
Mr.Ramesh
Coram
T.S.Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court