Sundaram v. Rohini R Bajibhakare
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act against the Respondent Collector, as the writ order from 2015 was subsequently complied with.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed with liberty to petitioner to work out remedies if aggrieved.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.03.2019
Coram:
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.111 of 2019
Sundaram
...Petitioner vs.
Rohini R.Bajibhakare The District Collector, Salem District, Salem. ...Respondent
Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts
Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for willfully disobeying the order of this Court dated 27.02.2015 made in W.P.No.5265 of 2015 on the file of this Court.
For Petitioner .. Mr.J.Sudhakaran For Respondents .. Mr.M.Elumalai Government Advocate
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sundaram
- respondent
Rohini R.Bajibhakare
Coram
T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court