S.a.Gurumoorthy v. Nirmala
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, the High Court closed the matter upon receipt of a letter from the Tahsildar dated 24.01.2019 confirming corrections to revenue records and issuance of the patta to the petitioner, noting that no costs are awarded.
What did the court decide?
Closure of contempt petition without costs after verifying corrections in revenue records.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.01.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.2358 of 2018
S.A.Gurumoorthy ... Petitioner -vs1.Mrs.Nirmala, The Thasildhar, Fort – Tondiarpet Taluk, Chennai-600 081. 2.The Commissioner, Chennai Corporation, Chennai-3. 3.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai-5. ... Respondents
(RR2 and 3 are suo motu impleaded as per order dated 14.12.2018 in Contempt Petition No.2358/2018)
PETITION under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.14800 of 2012, dated 16.04.2015.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.N.George Graham for M/s.Devadason and Sagar
For Respondent-1 : Mr.M.Elumalai, Government Advocate
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.A.Gurumoorthy
- respondent
Mrs.Nirmala
- respondent
The Commissioner, Chennai Corporation
- respondent
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court