Partly allowed

Panchavarnam v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC4 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/5196/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appearing before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, the Court, having considered the allegations, including specific overt acts by Tamil Selvi, disposed of an application for anticipatory bail granted partial relief by rejecting it for Tamil Selvi and granting it to other accused subject to conditions under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Order of anticipatory bail granted to the first, third and fourth petitioners subject to conditions; petition dismissed as against the second petitioner, Tamil Selvi.

Panchavarnam Vs the Inspector of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Fourth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.5196 of 2018

1 PANCHAVARNAM

2 TAMIL SELVI

3 RAMESH

4 DHARMENDRAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1,3 TO5

¶10

¶11

THE STATE REP.BY ITS, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHATRAKUDI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶12

IN CR.NO. 40/2018 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

¶13

For Petitioners : M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate

¶14

For Respondent : MR.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶15

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶16

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶17

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 & 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.40 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

¶18

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent.

¶19

3.The defacto complainant is 60 years old lady, namely Arasi. It appears that the petitioners herein were upset by the moves taken by the said defacto complainant for giving marriage of her grand daughter in favour of nephew of the first accused. During the quarrel, the five accused surrounded the de facto complainant and assaulted her. Accused No.3, namely Tamil Selvi had hit on the head of the de facto complainant and she is still taking treatment in the hospital.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Therefore, considering the specific overt act attributed to the said Tamil Selvi, this Court dismissed this Criminal Original

¶21

Petition so far as the second petitioner / A3, namely Tamil Selvi is concerned.

¶22

5.However, taking note of the allegations against the other accused, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the first, third and fourth petitioners subject to the following conditions. Accordingly, the first, third and fourth petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The first, third and fourth petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶23

6.The first, third and fourth petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶24

sd/04/04/2018 / TRUE COPY /

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PARAMAKUDI

¶28

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶29

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHATRAKUDI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶30

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶31

+1. CC to M/S.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate SR.No.5463

¶32

GNS

¶33

GJM/RR/CSL/RNB/11.4.18-2P-6C

¶34

ORDER

¶35

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5196 of 2018 Date :04/04/2018

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Panchavarnam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Panchavarnam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arumugam Vs the Inspector of Police

Govindan Vs the Inspector of Police

Vignesh Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Suresh, Vs the Inspector of Police

Vignesh @ Vikki Venkatesan Vs the Inspector of Police

M. Syed Ibrahim @ Valantha Vs the Inspector of Police