Allowed

R.Suresh, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC4 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/5177/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. granting the petitioner release upon production of bond and sureties, subject to conditions including appearance before police and magistrate, after noting a change in circumstances from earlier rejection.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered to be released on bail on producing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties each for like sum, complying with statutory conditions and appearing before magistrate within 15 days.

R.Suresh, Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Fourth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.5177 of 2018

¶6

R.SURESH, ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN

¶7

¶8

THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUNGAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.35 OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.K.P.NARAYANAKUMAR Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : MR.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU,

¶11

Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 457, 380, 427 and 435 IPC in Crime No.35 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶15

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent.

¶16

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that this Court rejected the earlier anticipatory bail petition based on the fact that only on the instigation of the first accused, the documents of the de facto complainant have been set fire. In fact, the documents are safe.

¶17

4.In view of the change in circumstances and considering the fact that the petitioner is only a pump operator, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner

¶18

shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶19

5 .The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶20

/ TRUE COPY /

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, GNS Madurai - 625 023. TO

¶22

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERANIEL

¶23

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

¶24

KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.

¶25

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUNGAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT

¶26

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶27

+1. CC to M/S.K.P.NARAYANAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.5384

¶28

GJM/RR/CSL/RNB/11.4.18-2P-6C

¶29

CRL OP(MD) No.5177 of 2018

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Suresh, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Suresh, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arumugam Vs the Inspector of Police

Govindan Vs the Inspector of Police

Vignesh Vs the Inspector of Police

Vignesh @ Vikki Venkatesan Vs the Inspector of Police

Panchavarnam Vs the Inspector of Police

M. Syed Ibrahim @ Valantha Vs the Inspector of Police