Allowed

Vignesh @ Vikki Venkatesan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC4 Apr 2018CRL OP(MD)/5182/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners accused of offences involving abusive language, threats, and receiving money, pending the filing of a regular bail bond and appearance before the concerned magistrate within 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted with conditions to execute a bond, appear before the magistrates within 15 days, and comply with police interrogation requirements.

Vignesh @ Vikki Venkatesan Vs the Inspector of Police — Caste Atrocities | Madras HC (2018)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Fourth day of April Two Thousand and Eighteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.5182 of 2018

¶6

1 VIGNESH @ VIKKI VENKATESAN

¶7

2 SUBRAMANIAN @ MURUGESAN

¶8

3 RADHA

¶9

4 PREMA ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1 to 4

¶10

THE STATE REP. BY

¶11

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARALVOIMOZHI POLICE STATION, ARALVOIMOZHI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

¶12

(CRIME NO. 77 OF 2018). ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶13

For Petitioner : M/S.S.KARTHICK SUBRAMANIAN Advocate

¶14

For Respondent : M/S. A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶15

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶16

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶17

The petitioners / accused Nos.1 to 4 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 506(i) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, on the file of the respondent police and they seek anticipatory bail.

¶18

2.The petitioners are said to have received some amount from the defacto complainant. Subsequently, they failed to repay the amount and scolded the defacto complainant using filthy language and also threatened her with dire consequences. Therefore, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint and the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.77 of 2018, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Aralvoimozhi Police Station, Aralvoimozhi, Kanyakumari District.

¶19

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl side) appearing for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondent.

¶20

4.It is submitted that no injury has been caused to the defacto complainant and there is no previous case registered against any of the petitioners.

¶21

5.Considering these aspects, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Boothapandi and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two common sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶22

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶23

/ TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BOOTHAPANDI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 2 DO THOUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI AT NAGERCOIL. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARALVOIMOZHI POLICE STATION, ARALVOIMOZHI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.S.KARTHICK SUBRAMANIAN Advocate SR.No.5376.

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Date :04/04/2018 SDS/CM:VR/SAR.4/06.04.2018/3P/6C

Vignesh @ Vikki Venkatesan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vignesh @ Vikki Venkatesan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arumugam Vs the Inspector of Police

Govindan Vs the Inspector of Police

Vignesh Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Suresh, Vs the Inspector of Police

Panchavarnam Vs the Inspector of Police

M. Syed Ibrahim @ Valantha Vs the Inspector of Police