5.It is seen that the petitioners herein had earlier filed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1336 of 2018 before this Court, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with the case registered in Crime No.6 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police. This Court granted anticipatory bail on 31.01.2018. It is seen that the de-facto complainant in the said case was one Isakkiraja, Sub-Inspector of Police, Pudukkottai Police Station. Though the said Crime No.6 of 2018 was registered under Section 307 IPC, this Court granted anticipatory bail finding that the circumstances in and around the occurrence created a doubt. It is seen that the present F.I.R is also registered at the instance of the very same Isakkiraja, Sub-Inspector of Police, Pudukottai Police Station. The occurrence took place within the patrol limits of Morapanadu Police Station. It is not known as to why the Sub-Inspector of Police, Pudukottai police station should be the complainant in the present case. The earlier complaint lodged against the petitioners created doubt in mind of this Court. It is seen that one Petchithai, wife of the first petitioner herein lodged a written complaint against the said Idakkiraja on 17.03.2018. That is why, even though there is strong opposition from the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) citing the registration of previous cases against the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail.
