G.Kumaresan v. Hans Raj Veerma IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of an order dated 02.3.2015, the Madras High Court directed respondents to initiate the tender process for incomplete works under the Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tender Rules, 2000, and permit the petitioner to participate.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondents to initiate tender process for incomplete works under Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tender Rules, 2000, permitting petitioner to participate; petitioner to receive compliance rep
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.3.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Contempt Petition No.582 of 2015 Excel Engineering Enterprises No.63, Tamaraikulam Elagiri Post, Jolarpettai, Vellore District rep. by its Proprietor G.Kumaresan. .. Petitioner Vs. 1. Hans Raj Veerma, IAS State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government Environment and Forests (EC2) Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. 2. Vinoth Kumar, IFS Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (HOFF) Panagal Building, Chennai - 600 015. 3. Sudhansu Gupta, IFS Chief Conservator of Forests Planning and Development Panagal Building, Chennai 15. 4. K.Selvaraj District Forest Officer Thirupattur Forest Division Thirupattur, Vellore District. 5. Sampath Forest Contractor, Near Santhai Maithanam Alangayam, Vaniyambadi Taluk Vellore District. 6. Gunasekaran Forest Contractor, Periyakasinaickenpatti Koratti, Thirupattur Taluk Vellore District. .. Respondents
2
Petition against the wilful disobedience of the order dated 02.3.2015 made in W.P.No.32111 of 2014.
For Petitioner :Mr.S.Doraisamy For Respondents 1-4 :Mr.P.H.Arvind Pandian, Addl.A.G. For Mr.M.K.Subramanian, Spl.GP(F) For Respondent-5 :No appearance For Respondent-6 :Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Mr.G.B.Saravana Bhavan
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct respondents to initiate the tender process for uncompleted works and permit the petitioner to participate.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Excel Engineering Enterprises No.63, Tamaraikulam Elagiri Post, Jolarpettai, Vellore District rep. by its Proprietor G.Kumaresan
- respondent
Hans Raj Veerma, IAS State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government Environment and Forests (EC2) Department Secretariat, Chennai 600 009
- respondent
Vinoth Kumar, IFS Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (HOFF) Panagal Building, Chennai - 600 015
- respondent
Sudhansu Gupta, IFS Chief Conservator of Forests Planning and Development Panagal Building, Chennai 15
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court