S.Kannan v. M.Tamilselvan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition for violation of a High Court order. Court reported that the order was complied with, rendering the petition infructuous, and closed the petition and sub-application. Period: April 2015.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed as infructuous due to compliance; sub-application closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 07.04.2015
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Contempt Petition No.403 OF 2015
and
Sub.A.No.87 of 2015
S.Kannan ...Petitioner
Vs
Mr.M.Tamilselvan, The Executive Officer, Ulundurpet Town Panchayat, Ulundurpet, Villupuram District. ...Respondent Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt
of Court Act, 1971, seeking to punish the respondent for committed willful Contempt of the order of this Hon'ble High Court made in W.P.No.32262/14 dated 10.12.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran
For Respondent : Mr.I.Arokiasamy, G.A.
O R D E R
It is reported by the learned counsel for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner that the order has been complied with.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition remains valid after compliance with the impugned order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Kannan
- respondent
Mr.M.Tamilselvan
Coram
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court