R.Kala v. Maharabhushanam
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of an earlier order. The court held that since the main writ petition was withdrawn, the contempt petition stands closed.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed as the main writ petition was withdrawn.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.3.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Contempt Petition No.3115 of 2014
R.Kala .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. Maharabhushanam
District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayats
Salem District, Salem.
2. P.Gopinathan
Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat)
Office of the Salem Panchayat Union
Salem 636 030. .. Respondents
-----
Petition against the wilful disobedience of the order
dated 14.10.2014 made in M.P.No.1 of 2014 in W.P.No.27217
of 2014.
----For Petitioner : Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondents : Mr.P.Chinnadurai, Govt. Advocate
2
O R D E R
This contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful
disobedience of the order dated 14.10.2014 made in M.P.No.1
of 2014 in W.P.No.27217 of 2014. Since the main writ
petition has been withdrawn, this contempt petition is
closed.
kpl
SD/
DEPUTY REGISTRAR(CLAA)
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2015.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
SS/CO/27/03/2015
One CC to Government Pleader, SR.3443
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Kala
- respondent
Maharabhushanam District Collector cum Inspector of Panchayats Salem District Salem
- respondent
P.Gopinathan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court