Petitioners sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Counsel requested withdrawal of the petition, which was entertained, resulting in dismissal as withdrawn.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Fifteenth day of October Two Thousand Fourteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM
CRL OP(MD) No.18126 of 2014
1 A.KARNAN
2 K.VIMALA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.3&4
Vs
STATE REPRESENTED BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, USILAMPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT, CRIME NO.23/2012 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.T.VADIVELAN Advocate
For Respondent : M/S.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
In view of the same, this Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, USILAMPATTI, MADURAI DISTRICT RL/3 C- 20/10/2014
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. KARNAN
K. VIMALA
STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
G CHOCKALINGAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
