Shanmugam v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition for bail withdrawn by the petitioner counsel. Court dismissed the petition without engaging on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Fourteenth day of October Two Thousand Fourteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.CHOCKALINGAM
CRL OP(MD) No.18215 of 2014
1 SHANMUGAM 2 S.K. MUTHU ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED No.A5 & A8
Vs
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BOOTHAPANDY POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 296 OF 2014. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.T.LAJAPATHI ROY Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.P.Kannithevan Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/14/10/2014
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
BOOTHAPANDY POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT. 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.18215 of 2014
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Date :14/10/2014 gdr 17.10.2014 1p/4C
SHANMUGAM
S.K. MUTHU
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE BOOTHAPANDY
G. CHOCKALINGAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court