Krishnakumar v. Excise Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court in Kerala dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the matter had become such that the petition was no longer viable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
TUESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2010 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1932
WP(C).No. 11053 of 2007(N)
PETITIONERS:
KIZHAKKE BHAGAM, PATHANAPURAM P.O.
BY ADV. SRI.VINOY VARGHESE KALLUMOOTTILL
RESPONDENT(S):
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.N.SUDHA DEVI FOR R1 TO 3
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J.
-------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 11053 of 2007
--------------------------------Dated this the 25th day of May, 2010
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
matter has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is accordingly
dismissed as infructuous.
SD/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.)
dsn
True copy
KRISHNAKUMAR
K.K.THOMAS
EXCISE COMMISSIONER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER, KOLLAM
EXCISE INSPECTOR, ANCHEL EXCISE RANGE
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court