A contempt of court case where the petitioner submitted that all directions from the prior judgment dated 08.08.2007 were complied with, leading the court to close the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
MONDAY, THE 24TH MAY 2010 / 3RD JYAISHTA 1932 Con.Case(C).No. 1122 of 2009(S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.16871/2007 Dated 08/08/2007 ....................
PETITIONER:
MUMTHAZ, W/O.IBRAHIM KUTTY, AGED 45 YEARS, METHAZHIKATHU VEEDU, CHERIKKONAM, THRIKKOVILVATTOM, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P
RESPONDENT/3RD RESPONDENT:
RAVEENDRAN NAIR,K., (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE IS NOT KNOWN) SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, L.A.K.I.P.NO.II, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM.
BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J.
-------------------------------------
Contempt Court(C)No. 1122 of 2009
---------------------------------
Dated this the 24th day of May, 2010
JUDGMENT
It is submitted that the directions in the judgment have
been complied with.
The Contempt of Court Case is closed.
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.
dsn
Mumthaz
Raveendran Nair, K.
T.R. Ramachandran Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
