The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous by the single Judge on the submission of the petitioner's counsel that the matter had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
TUESDAY, THE 25TH MAY 2010 / 4TH JYAISHTA 1932
WP(C).No. 10387 of 2007(J)
PETITIONER:
P.THYAGU, S/O UPENDRAN, KRISHNA VILASOM HOUSE, CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE, CHIRAYANKIZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT(S):
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.N.SUDHA DEVI FOR R1 TO 5
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/05/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J.
-------------------------------------
W.P.(C) No. 10387 of 2007
---------------------------------
Dated this the 25th day of May, 2010
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
matter has become infructuous. The Writ Petition is accordingly
dismissed as infructuous.
SD/-(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.)
dsn
True copy
P. Thyagu
State of Kerala
T.R. Ramachandran Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
