Dismissed
Bhuneswary v. K.Radhakrishnan
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1142/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.P.R.RAMAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
TUESDAY, THE 16TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 27TH MAGHA 1931
Con.Case(C).No. 1142 of 2009(S)
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.32308/2008 Dated 01/06/2009
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS:
AGED 50, KUNDALATTU, DO. DO.
BY ADV. SRI.J.OM PRAKASH
RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT:
K.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, AGED 54, S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, WORKING AS SECRETARY S.L.PURAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., S.L.PURAM P.O., CHERTHALA.
BY ADVS M/S. S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY, N.SANTHA, S.A.ANAND & PETER JOSE CHRISTO
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R. RAMAN Ag. CJ & C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = CONT. CASE (C) 1142 OF 2009 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = DATED THIS, THE 16TH TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2010.
Raman, Ag. CJ.
When this contempt case came up for further consideration, it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that the judgment has been complied with. In the above view of the matter, there is no need for proceeding further in this contempt application.
Closed.
P.R. RAMAN, (Ag. CHIEF JUSTICE)
C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, (JUDGE).
knc/-
Bhuvaneshary
K.R. Ravi
Madhavikutty Amma
Retnamma
K.J. Yohannan
K. Radhakrishnan Nair
P.R. Raman
C.N. Ramachandran Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court