The court found that the complaint in the contempt application had been redressed. Consequently, the contempt case was closed. No substantive legal proposition was laid down.
The contempt case was closed as the complaint was redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
MONDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 26TH MAGHA 1931
Con.Case(C).No. 1543 of 2009(S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WA.2730/2007 Dated 24/07/2009
PETITIONER(S): 1ST RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT APPEAL:
C.C.KOCHUTHRESSIA, W/O.JOHN K.P. AGED 54, KURUTHUKULANGARA HOUSE, THANAPADAM, KANDASSAMKADAVU P.O., THRISSUR.
BY ADV. SRI.S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF
RESPONDENT(S): 2ND APPELLANT IN THE WRIT APPEAL:
SARASWATHI, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR.
BY SR.GOVT. PLEADER SMT.MEENA.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R.RAMAN, Ag.C.J. & C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
Contempt Case (c) No. 1543 of 2009
Dated this the 15th day of February, 2010
J U D G M E N T
Raman, Ag.C.J.
. It is submitted that the complaint made in the
contempt application has been redressed. Accordingly, the
contempt of court case is closed.
P.R.RAMAN, Ag. CHIEF JUSTICE
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE
nj.
C.C. Kochuthressia
Saraswathi
P.R. Ram
C.N. Ramachandran Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
