The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a contempt case. The High Court granted permission and dismissed the case as withdrawn, with no prejudice to alternate remedies, without addressing any substantive questions.
Permission granted to withdraw the contempt case without prejudice to other remedies; the case is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR MONDAY, THE 15TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 26TH MAGHA 1931 Con.Case(C).No. 116 of 2010(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.23527/2007 Dated 18/08/2009 ....................
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER ----------------------RAJANI MOHAN, AGED 39 YEARS, W/O.MOHANAN, KURAVANPARAMBIL HOUSE, UDAYAMPEROOR P.O., MANAKUNNAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN SRI.K.K.GOPINATHAN NAIR SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.MATHEW SUNNY
RESPONDENT(S): 2ND RESPONDENT -------------------------
MR.THANKACHAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, (FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), PRESENTLY WORKING AS THE TAHSILDAR (R.R), KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM.
BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SMT. MEENA.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R.RAMAN, Ag.C.J. & C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
Contempt Case (C) No.116 of 2010
Dated this the 15th day of February, 2010
J U D G M E N T
Raman, Ag.C.J.
When the matter came up for consideration, the learned counsel, Sri.K.K.Gopinathan Nair, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the contempt case, without prejudice to his rights to alternate remedies available under law. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed as withdrawn, subject to his other remedies available under law.
P.R.RAMAN, Ag. CHIEF JUSTICE
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
JUDGE
nj.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the contempt petition.
RAJANI MOHAN
MR.THANKACHAN
P.R.RAMAN
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
