Muhammed Yusuf v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala rejected the application for anticipatory bail issued to nullify a court warrant and directed the petitioner to surrender before the Magistrate and file for regular bail within two weeks.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 15TH MAY 2007 / 25TH VAISAKHA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 2797 of 2007() ----------------------------CRIME NO. 253 OF 2007 OF NEDUMKANDOM POLICE STATION
PETITIONER/ACCUSED ----------------------MUHAMMED YUSUF, S/O.THAMBI RAWTHER, OOTTUKULATHU HOUSE, BLOCK NO.673, THIRD CAMP KARA, KARUNAPURAM VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.PAULY MATHEW MURICKEN
RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT
STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMKANDAM POLICE STATION.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when non-bailable warrants are pending due to the accused's non-appearance in court.
Whether the petitioner should surrender and seek regular bail instead of this application.
What procedural instruction is given to the petitioner regarding surrender and future bail application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUHAMMED YUSUF
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V. RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court