Allowed

Pareeth v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC15 May 2007Bail Appl./2734/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, an accused in a case involving offences under Sections 323, 341, 447, and 506 IPC, for a period of one month subject to specific conditions including reporting to the police and seeking regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail for one month; bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; report on Wednesdays; surrender for regular bail.

Pareeth Vs State of Kerala — Cheating and Forgery | Kerala HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 15TH MAY 2007 / 25TH VAISAKHA 1929

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 2734 of 2007 ------------------------------------CRIME NO. 67/2007 OF THE PONTHANICADU POLICE STATION

¶6

PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶7

-----------------------------------

¶8

PAREETH, S/O.MOITHEEN, KURINJILAKADU HOUSE, PALLARIMANGALAM, KOTHAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR

¶10

RESPONDENTS: STATE

¶11

------------------

¶12

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI.

¶13

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POTHANICADU POLICE STATION.

¶14

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. P.N. SUKUMARAN

¶15

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶17

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bail Application No. 2734 of 2007

¶18

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED: 15-05-2007

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the accused in Crime No. 67 of 2007 of Pothanicadu Police Station for an offences punishable under Secs.323, 341, 447 and 506 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

¶21

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶22

Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioner on bail for a period of one month in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions:

¶23

Petitioner shall report before the Investigating

¶24

Bail A.No. 2734 of 2007

¶25

-:2:-

¶26

Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶27

The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶28

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶29

Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶30

Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile.

¶31

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶32

This application is allowed as above.

¶33

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶34

ani.

Pareeth v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pareeth v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

4SHOK Kumar and Another Vs the State of Kerala

Prasanth Chandran Vs State

Ajayakumar Vs State of Kerala

C. Muhammed Iqbal Vs State of Kerala

A.C.Rajeevan Vs State of Kerala

Muhammed Yusuf Vs State of Kerala