Disposed

A.C.Rajeevan v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC15 May 2007Bail Appl./2768/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court of Kerala rejected the grant of anticipatory bail. It directed the petitioners to surrender for interrogation between 22nd and 24th May 2007, followed by a bail consideration before the Magistrate. The matter was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Direction to surrender for interrogation between 22nd and 24th May 2007; subsequent bail to be decided by Magistrate.

A.C.Rajeevan Vs State of Kerala — Cheating and Forgery | Kerala HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 15TH MAY 2007 / 25TH VAISAKHA 1929

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 2768 of 2007() ----------------------------------------(CRIME NO.165 OF 2007 OF THALASSERY POLICE STATION)

¶6

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 3 & 2:

¶7

-------------------------------------------

¶8

1. A.C.RAJEEVAN, S/O. CHATHUKUTTY, AGED 42 YEARS, LAKSHMI NIVAS, KADIRUR POST, THALASSERY.

¶9

2. C.SUNIL KUMAR, S/O. BALAN, AGED 38 YEARS, "SARAYU", KUTTIMAKKOOL, THIRUVANGAD POST, THALASSERY.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR

¶11

RESPONDENTS: STATE & COMPLAINANT.

¶12

----------------------------------------------------------------

¶13

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶14

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THALASSERY POLICE STATION.

¶15

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. P.N. SUKUMARAN

¶16

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶17

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶18

Bail Application No. 2767 of 2007

¶19

----------------------------------

¶20

DATED: 15 .05.2007

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

Petitioners who are accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Crime No.165/07 of Thalassery Police Station for offences punishable under Secs.448, 427 and 380 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

¶23

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on any day between 22-5-2007 and 24-052007 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioners shall thereafter be produced on the same day before the Magistrate who shall consider and dispose of their application for bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶24

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶25

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶26

ani

A.C.Rajeevan v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.C.Rajeevan v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

4SHOK Kumar and Another Vs the State of Kerala

Prasanth Chandran Vs State

Ajayakumar Vs State of Kerala

Pareeth Vs State of Kerala

C. Muhammed Iqbal Vs State of Kerala

Muhammed Yusuf Vs State of Kerala