Disposed

C. Muhammed Iqbal v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC15 May 2007Bail Appl./2767/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, fourth accused in a Section 448/427/380 IPC case, sought anticipatory bail. Court rejected immediate grant but permitted surrender for interrogation between 22-05-2007 and 24-05-2007 before bail consideration by Magistrate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to surrender for interrogation between 22-5-2007 and 24-5-2007 before Magistrate for bail consideration.

C. Muhammed Iqbal Vs State of Kerala — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 15TH MAY 2007 / 25TH VAISAKHA 1929

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 2767 of 2007() --------------------------------------(CRIME NO.165OF 2007 OF THALASSERY POLICE STATION)

¶6

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.4:

¶7

-----------------------------------------

¶8

C.MUHAMMED IQBAL, S/O. AHAMMED, AGED 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT BUSHRA HOUSE, CHIRAKKARA, THALASSERY.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR

¶10

RESPONDENTS: STATE & COMPLAINANT:

¶11

--------------------------------------------------------------

¶12

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI.

¶13

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, THALASSERY POLICE STATION.

¶14

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. K.C. SANTHOSH KUMAR

¶15

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/05/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶17

Bail Application No. 2767 of 2007

¶18

----------------------------------

¶19

DATED: 15 .05.2007

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

Petitioner who is the 4^th accused in Crime No.165/07 of Thalassery Police Station for offences punishable under Secs.448, 427 and 380 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

¶22

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. 3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have his application for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer on any day between 22-5-2007 and 24-05-2007 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioner shall thereafter be produced on the same day before the Magistrate who shall consider and dispose of his application for bail preferably on the same date on which it is filed.

¶23

This petition is disposed of as above.

¶24

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

¶25

ani

C. Muhammed Iqbal v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C. Muhammed Iqbal v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

4SHOK Kumar and Another Vs the State of Kerala

Prasanth Chandran Vs State

Ajayakumar Vs State of Kerala

Pareeth Vs State of Kerala

A.C.Rajeevan Vs State of Kerala

Muhammed Yusuf Vs State of Kerala