Disposed
T.Anshad,Rep.by P/a Holder M.Thaha v. Regional Transport Authority,Tvm.& Ors.
Kerala HCWP(C)/32340/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2006 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1928
WP(C).No. 32340 of 2006(Y)
--------------------------
PETITIONER:
---------------
T.ANSHAD, T.C.35/625, AIRPORT ROAD, VALLAKADAVU P.O., TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER M.THAHA, T.C.34/1249, AIRPORT ROAD, VALLAKADAVU P.O., TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNA MENON SRI.JITHESH MENON
RESPONDENTS:
------------------
1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM.
3. THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM.
BYGOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.M.A.FAYAZ
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.R.RAMAN, J.
```````````````````````````
W.P.(C) NO. 32340 OF 2006
```````````````````````````
Dated this the 15th day of December, 2006
J U D G M E N T
The grievance of the petitioner is that sufficient
arrangements has been made before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal.
that arrangements are already made and orders will be issued expeditiously. The same is recorded.
Writ petition is closed in the above terms.
P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE
Rp
T.ANSHAD
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, TRIVANDRUM
THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM
THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
P.R.RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court