Nasar v. Secretary, Rta, Kasaragod
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order dismissing a writ petition as the respondent contends the petitioner's exhibit was not received; no relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2006 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1928
WP(C).No. 24046 of 2006(K)
--------------------------
PETITIONER:
---------------
NAZAR, S/O. IBRAHIM, B.R.M.HOUSE, ICHILANGAD, MANGALADY, KASARAGOD.
BY ADV. SRI.A.K.ABDUL AZEEZ
RESPONDENT:
----------------
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KASARAGOD.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.D.P.RENU
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WPC NO. 24046/2006
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1: PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE EXHIBIT P2: PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 15.08.2006
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
J U D G M E N T
The prayer sought for is for a direction to consider and dispose of Ext.P2.
Dismissed.
P.R. RAMAN, (JUDGE)
NAZAR
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KASARAGOD
P.R. RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court