The petitioner sought permission to withdraw Criminal Revision No. 533 of 2021. The state raised no objection. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the revision as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw Criminal Revision No. 533 of 2021; the revision dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No. 533 of 2021
….
Niteesh Kumar @ Nitish Kumar …… Petitioner Versus
2. Pinki Kumari …… Opp. Parties
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-----
For the petitioner : Mr. Brij Bihari Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Praful Jojo, A. P. P.
…. .
02/09.08.2023 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Criminal Revision No. 533 of 2021.
Learned counsel for the State raised no objection. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this Criminal Revision No. 533 of 2021. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision No. 533 of 2021 is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Kamlesh/
Niteesh Kumar @ Nitish Kumar
State of Jharkhand
Pinki Kumari
Sanjay Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
