Criminal Revision petition allowed to be withdrawn as the underlying matter was disposed of in the Confiscation Case, rendering the revision infructuous.
Permission granted to withdraw the criminal revision; the revision dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 1088 of 2018
….
Kuleshwar Mahto …… Petitioner
Versus
2. Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorized Officer, Ramgarh
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
-----
For the petitioner : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A. P. P.
…. .
07/09.08.2023 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present Criminal Revision No. 1088 of 2018 as the final order has been passed in Confiscation Case and as such, it has become infructuous.
Learned counsel for the State raised no objection.
In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this Criminal Revision No. 1088 of 2018 as it has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Criminal Revision No. 1088 of 2018 is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Kamlesh/
Kuleshwar Mahto
State of Jharkhand
Divisional Forest Officer-cum-Authorized Officer, Ramgarh
Sanjay Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
