Single judge dismissed the criminal revision as infructuous on the ground that the petitioners failed to challenge the conviction within the relevant period as they had already served their probation bond terms under Section 360 Cr.P.C. without raising any appellate grounds.
Criminal Revision No. 1748 of 2018 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 1748 of 2018
1.Lakhi Pandit
2.Reba Pandit @ Rewa Pandit
3.Delo Pandit @ Dalo Pandit
5.Nabi Pandit
6.Bansi Pandit @ Banshi Pandit
7.Dina @ Dineshwar Pandit
8.Rudo Pandit
Oral Judgment in Court 06/Dated: 09th August, 2023
This Criminal Revision has been filed on behalf of the petitioners by challenging the judgment dated 30.06.2018 passed by Sri Mahendra Prasad, learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Deoghar in Criminal Appeal No.08 of 2014 by which the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed and who has upheld the release of the petitioners thereby affirming the judgment of conviction and sentence of furnishing probation bond of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each by all the petitioners passed by Sri Manish Ranjan, learned S.D.J.M, Deoghar in G.R. Case No.585 of 2004, T.R. Case No.186 of 2014 by which the petitioners have been convicted for the offences under section 147 and 323 of the I.P.C and they have been directed to enter into bond of Rs.5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to appear and receive sentence when called upon during the period of two years.
2
sustainable in the eye of law. It has been submitted that the petitioners have been convicted due to land disputes. However, learned counsel for the petitioners has fairly submitted that the petitioners have also furnished bonds as per the direction passed by the learned court below and hence necessary order may be passed.
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Saket/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the criminal revision given that the petitioners fulfilled their probation obligations for the stipulated period.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Lakhi Pandit
Reba Pandit @ Rewa Pandit
Delo Pandit @ Dalo Pandit
Tholo Pandit
Nabi Pandit
Bansi Pandit @ Banshi Pandit
Sanjay Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
