Criminal discharge petition rejected; case pending for defence evidence renders revision infructuous; Criminal Revision dismissed.
Criminal Revision No. 1741 of 2018 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 1741 of 2018
... Petitioner Santosh Kumar Singh @ Santosh Singh -Versus-
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD
--------For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P.
Order No. 04/ Dated: 09.08.2023
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on
repeated call.
However, learned A.P.P. is present.
-2
(Sanjay Prasad, J.)
Bibha/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision challenging rejection of discharge is maintainable when the case is pending for defence evidence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Kumar Singh @ Santosh Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
