Disposals a contempt proceeding where the petitioner was not satisfied with the pay scale granted in a prior order, granting liberty to work out remedy.
Contempt proceeding dropped; liberty to work out remedy in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Contempt Case (Civil) No.460 of 2021
Reena Das
…. …. Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurav Arun, Adv. : Mr. Ujjwal Sinha, Adv For the O.Ps. : Mr. Awanish Shekhar, AC to AAG-I : Mr.A.K. Mehta, Adv. ----
17/Dated: 10th October, 2023
1. It appears that the order dated 08.02.2021 passed in W.P(S) No.4370 of 2020 has already been complied with.
2. It further appears that the petitioner is not satisfied with the pay scale granted to her as she is claiming different pay scale.
3. In view of the above facts, the present contempt case is disposed of and contempt proceeding is hereby, dropped giving liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy in accordance with law.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Raja/-
Reena Das
State of Jharkhand
Shailesh Kumar Singh
Anjani Kumar Srivastava
Colonel Mithlesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
