Allowed

Sheikh Miraj Alias Gulla v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC9 Oct 2023B.A./7956/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand allowed a renewed bail application. After hearing counsel and noting the applicant's long custody and the framing of charges, the court directed the release of the accused on bail subject to conditions regarding sureties and the submission of Aadhaar and mobile numbers.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties, conditioned to submit Aadhaar and mobile number.

Sheikh Miraj Alias Gulla Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.7956 of 2023 Sheikh Miraj @ Gulla @ SK. Mairaj … …Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand … …Opp. Party(s)

¶2

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. M.K. Dash, Adv. For the State : Mr. P. Chatterjee, A.P.P.

¶3

¶4

04/09.10.2023: Heard the parties.

¶5

The applicant, who is in custody since 25.10.2022, has renewed the prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with Baharagora P.S. Case No.75 of 2022 (G.R. No.51 of 2023) registered for the offence under Sections 414/34 of IPC, Sections 12/ 13/ 15 of Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act, Section 11 of Cruelty to Animal Act and Sections 46 to 56 of Animal Transport Rule, 1978.

¶6

Earlier the prayer for bail of the applicant(s) has been rejected vide order dated 29.03.2023 passed in B.A. No.14048 of 2022. 4. It has been submitted by the counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR/ Complaint Case along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her

¶7

part.

¶8

Innocence has been claimed and participation in the trial has been assured. It has been submitted that the applicant is in custody for about a year and further, charge has already been framed. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been renewed.

¶9

On the other hand, learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail. 7. Considering the period of custody and the fact that charge has already been framed, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant (s) on bail. Accordingly, the applicant(s), above named, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Ghatshila, in connection with Baharagora P.S. Case No.75 of 2022 (G.R. No.51 of 2023)on the condition that the applicant(s) will submit selfattested photocopy of his Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his mobile number(s) before the learned court below which he will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.

¶10

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

¶11

Ravi/-

Sheikh Miraj Alias Gulla v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheikh Miraj Alias Gulla v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sirajuddin Khan Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Sarfaraz Vs the State of Jharkhand

Chandradeep Kumar Saw Alias Sao Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pratap Ganjhu Alias Mahadeo Ganjhu Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Manir Ansari Alias Manir Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Anwar Ali Alias Anwar Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand