Petitioner sought permission to withdraw her writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authority subsequently; the court granted permission and dismissed the petition.
Permission to withdraw writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authority granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 2862 of 2021
Philomina Toppo ... … Petitioner
-Versus-
… … Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. K.K. Ambastha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sharad Kaushal, A.C. to A.A.G.-III
03/05.01.2022 The present case is taken up through video conferencing.
Mr. K.K. Ambastha, learned counsel for the petitioner, after some
argument, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to pursue the matter before the appropriate authority.
Mr. Sharad Kaushal, learned A.C. to A.A.G.-III appearing on behalf of
the respondents, has no objection to the same.
Permission is accorded.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Ritesh
Philomina Toppo
The State of Jharkhand
The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration & Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi
The Deputy Commissioner, Gumla
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Gumla
The Circle Officer, Ghaghra, District- Gumla
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
