Bhagwan Sao Alias Vishwanandan Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

So far as the defects No. 4 and 9(iii) are concerned, learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the same once the situation normalizes. As regards the rest defects, as pointed out by the office, are concerned, the same are ignored.

¶11

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No. 321 of 2019.

¶12

The informant was assaulted by the accused persons due to which he sustained several injuries. Reason for the occurrence appears to be land dispute. The informant although had sustained multiple injuries, but the allegations so far as the petitioners are concerned, are general and omnibus in nature.

¶13

Regard being had to the above, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court below within four weeks from today and on such surrender, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No. 321 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶14

This application stands allowed.

¶15

(RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY,J.)

¶16

MK

Bhagwan Sao Alias Vishwanandan Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagwan Sao Alias Vishwanandan Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Daninath Goswami Vs the State of Jharkhand

Uday Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Prakash Kumar Alias Prakash Chouhan Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kundan Kumar Mandal Alias Kundan Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rupesh Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Lolin Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand