The petitioner herein sought permission to withdraw an application. The Special Public Prosecutor raised no objection. Permission was accorded and the application was dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court at Ranchi.
Permission to withdraw the application was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3300 of 2020 Md. Mukhtar @ Mukhtar Ansari ..... Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY Through Video Conferencing
--For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, Spl. P.P. ---
Order No. 02 Dated 21st September, 2020
The defects No. 9(i) to 9(vi), as pointed out by the office, are ignored. Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, learned Spl. PP, does not have any objection. Permission is accorded.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
MK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md. Mukhtar @ Mukhtar Ansari
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
