The High Court at Ranchi granted the petitioner's request to withdraw a writ application, accordingly dismissing it as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the application was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A. B. A. No. 2628 of 2020
Saro Oraon … … Petitioner
Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand … … 2.Dasrath Ambuj Opposite Parties ---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
--For the Petitioner : M/s. Vishal Kumar Tiwari & Pravin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P.
4/08.10.2020 Mr. Vishal Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Mrs. Vandana Bharti, learned A.P.P. for the State does not have any objection.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
R. Shekhar Cp 3
Saro Oraon
The State of Jharkhand
Dasrath Ambuj
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court