In Cr. Revision No. 540 of 2001, the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi dismissed the petition for default due to the absence of the petitioner on repeated summons. No substantive decision was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 540 of 2001
Bhola Nath Dubey …… Petitioner Versus Vinod Sao & Ors. …........Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH For the Petitioner : None For the State :A.P.P.
10/Dated: 22/02/2018
On repeated calls, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Accordingly, this criminal revision is dismissed for default.
Satyarthi/-
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
Bhola Nath Dubey
Vinod Sao
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
