Disposed

Kishore Saw And Ors. v. The State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC21 Feb 2018A.B.A./250/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order deals with an application for anticipatory bail in connection with offences under sections 175, 379, 414, 420 IPC and mining rules. The court directed petitioners to surrender within four weeks and enlarged them on bail upon submission of a security bond of Rs. 15,000 each along with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Direct petitioners to surrender within four weeks to be enlarged on bail upon submission of Rs. 15,000 bond with sureties.

Kishore Saw And Ors. Vs The State Of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B. A. No.250 of 2018

¶3

Kishore Saw 2. Md. Wasim Akaram @ Wasim Ansari 3.Maimuna Khatoon …… Petitioners Versus

¶4

The State of Jharkhand …........Opposite Party

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH For the Petitioners :Mr. Sudhir Kr. Roy, Advocates For the State :A.P.P.

¶6

02/Dated: 21/02/2018

¶7

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dhanwar P.S. Case No. 177 of 2017, corresponding to G.R. No. 1632 of 2017 for the offence under sections 175, 379, 414, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 21 (A), 21(b), 22 Mines and Minerals Development Rules 2004 and Mineral Rules 3,9 (2) pending in the Court of learned J.M, Ist Class, Giridih.

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and the other co-accused of this case namely Allaudin Ansari, Shekhwat Ansari, Md. Siraj, Hafiz Ansari, Md. Iliyas, Sabir Mian, Md. Ajahar, Afjal Ansari and Kishore Rana @ Kishroe Kumar Rana have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in A.B.A. No. 5852 of 2017.

¶9

Learned A.P.P opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶10

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioners are directed to surrender before the court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of their arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge the above named petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand)each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of Sri S.K. Maharaj, learned J.M, Ist Class, Giridih, Pakur in connection with Dhanwar P.S. Case No. 177 of 2017, corresponding to G.R. No. 1632 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The petitioners are directed to deposit Rs.10,000/- each before the trial court on the date of their surrender. However, deposition of aforesaid amount would be subject to result of the case and will not affect the case of

¶11

the petitioners during trial.

¶12

(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)

¶13

Satyarthi/-

Kishore Saw And Ors. v. The State Of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishore Saw And Ors. v. The State Of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjit Kumar Choudhary Alias Sanjit Choudhary And Anr. Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Munshi Prasad Mehta And Anr. Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Sitaram Sao Alias Sitaram Sah Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Rajesh Mandal Alias Raju Mandal Alias Rajesh Kr Mandal Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Nauri Oraon Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Nitesh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Jharkhand